“I am very disappointed by the NFL’s decision to uphold the 4 game suspension against me. I did nothing wrong, and no one in the Patriots organization did either.
Advertisement
“Despite submitting to hours of testimony over the past six months, it is disappointing that the Commissioner upheld my suspension based upon a standard that it was “probable” that I was “generally aware” of misconduct. The fact is that neither I, nor any equipment person, did anything of which we have been accused. He dismissed my hours of testimony and it is disappointing that he found it unreliable.”
It continues:
“Most importantly, I have never written, texted, emailed to anybody at anytime, anything related to football air pressure before this issue was raised at the AFC Championship game in January. To suggest that I destroyed a phone to avoid giving the NFL information it requested is completely wrong.
“Regardless, the NFL knows that Mr. Wells already had ALL relevant communications with Patriots personnel that either Mr. Wells saw or that I was questioned about in my appeal hearing. There is no “smoking gun” and this controversy is manufactured to distract from the fact they have zero evidence of wrongdoing.”
“The Commissioner’s decision is deeply disappointing, but not surprising because the appeal process was thoroughly lacking in procedural fairness.
Most importantly, neither Tom nor the Patriots did anything wrong. And the NFL has no evidence that anything inappropriate occurred.
The appeal process was a sham, resulting in the Commissioner rubber-stamping his own decision. For example, the Wells investigative team was given over 100 days to conduct its investigation. Just days prior to the appeal hearing, we were notified that we would only have four hours to present a defense; therefore, we didn’t have enough time to examine important witnesses. Likewise, it was represented to the public that the Wells team was ‘independent’; however, when we requested documents from Wells, our request was rejected on the basis of privilege. We therefore had no idea as to what Wells found from other witnesses, nor did we know what those other witnesses said.
These are just two examples of how the Commissioner failed to ensure a fair process.
Additionally, the science in the Wells Report was junk. It has been thoroughly discredited by independent third parties.
Finally, as to the issue of cooperation, we presented the Commissioner with an unprecedented amount of electronic data, all of which is incontrovertible. I do not think that any private citizen would have agreed to provide anyone with the amount of information that Tom was willing to reveal to the Commissioner. Tom was completely transparent. All of the electronic information was ignored; we don’t know why. The extent to which Tom opened up his private life to the Commissioner will become clear in the coming days.
The Commissioner’s decision and discipline has no precedent in all of NFL history. His decision alters the competitive balance of the upcoming season. The decision is wrong and has no basis, and it diminishes the integrity of the game.”
- Additional reporting Tony Manfred, Business Insider
'Deflategate' could spill over to a new season as Tom Brady promises to persist with appeal
Updated at 17.45
TOM BRADY HAS finally broken his silence over the NFL’s decision to to uphold his client’s four-game suspension for his role in Deflategate.
The four-time Super Bowl winning New England Patriots quarterback took to his Facebook page to express his disappointment with the decision.
In the lengthy statement, Brady says:
“I am very disappointed by the NFL’s decision to uphold the 4 game suspension against me. I did nothing wrong, and no one in the Patriots organization did either.
“Despite submitting to hours of testimony over the past six months, it is disappointing that the Commissioner upheld my suspension based upon a standard that it was “probable” that I was “generally aware” of misconduct. The fact is that neither I, nor any equipment person, did anything of which we have been accused. He dismissed my hours of testimony and it is disappointing that he found it unreliable.”
It continues:
“Most importantly, I have never written, texted, emailed to anybody at anytime, anything related to football air pressure before this issue was raised at the AFC Championship game in January. To suggest that I destroyed a phone to avoid giving the NFL information it requested is completely wrong.
Earlier, Don Yee, has issued a fiery response to the NFL’s decision
“The appeal process was a sham, resulting in the Commissioner rubber-stamping his own decision,” he said.
Regarding the new revelation that Brady had his cellphone destroyed around the day he was scheduled to meet with NFL investigators, Yee said Brady was fully cooperative.
“Tom was completely transparent. All of the electronic information was ignored; we don’t know why,” he wrote.
The extent to which Tom opened up his private life to the Commissioner will become clear in the coming days.”
That sounds like more details will come from Brady’s camp this week. Either way, the NFL Players Association is expected to bring the case to federal court.
Here’s his full statement (via ESPN’s Adam Schefter):
- Additional reporting Tony Manfred, Business Insider
Tom Brady’s suspension was just upheld by the NFL
The NFL explains in one paragraph why Tom Brady destroying his mobile phone was so damning to his case
To embed this post, copy the code below on your site
American Football appeal Deflategate NFL no smoking gun Tom Brady US sports